On the topic of political parties taking part in elections conducted by the present regime:
Muncipality election and/or preponed parliamentary elections.

I think Nepali people are looking forward to the elections. After a long delay, finally Nepalis are getting a chance to elect their representatives.

this election is the only name of election and only for people who were active before 2046.Like bhoonte, who even doesn't have comon sence what is he talking.

this election is just like americans holding elections in iraq where a big portion of the population esp sunnis are not even participating

As long as we know there is not going to be any transparency in this election, it will just be a show off and a sort of formality.
Even if it is not, we are forced to believe it is. We can just wait and watcch who will turn out as winners. (All those ex-Panches in their 70's or their kins).

yeah, never fcuking satisfied!
There's going to be an election in the country after so long, and even before the elections are held people are denoucing it. Well, all you all mofos who believe in multiparty democracy, get out there and vote for the people you want to elect. This is what you all have been shouting about and now when the time comes, "this is not fair and thats not fair."
All you guys are good for is going home and fcuking your wives or whoever you have been sticking it to. May be you should just keep doing that and shut the fcuk up!

Why do you all 'royalists' have to use derogatory language for your arguments? Can't you talk rationally? May be you'll again come to verbal assault after this; if that's the case, i'll simply ignore it; and it'll further confirm your inability to defend your statements.

Mr. Bodega don't you really think if all the parties participate in the upcoming elections it's going to validate the unconstitutional steps taken by gyane?

Gwajyo,
Just cuz I dont agree with you doesn't mean that I am a royalist, Mr. self proclaimed rational mind.
Birbhadra,
I usually dont answer a question with questions, but whats constitutional in shaking hands with the Maoists in a foreign land that was arranged by foreign delegates in the matters that concerns only our motherland? You want me to believe that these ass wipes really consider whats valid and whats invalid in terms of ethics when they say or do something?
you must be out of your fcuking mind!

Mr. bodega, you can't argue rationally anymore that's why u need to use derogatory language again. If you're ready not to use any obscene words, I'm ready to discuss with you. Let's find out what the truth is.

Gwajyo,

You understand that I dont have to listen to anything you tell me. You are not my dad and you dont pay my bills. What makes you think that you can tell me how I should speak?

Anyway, this ends our further conversation then.

yeah, you just got yourself out of humility!

Gwajyo.
You know whats fcuked up?
in another thread, you wrote "another stereotype against black race," which I find it funny (ha! funny) considering the fact that not too long ago you questioned "why do you all 'royalists' have to use derogatory language for your arguments?"
Who keeps a check on your generalization? Remember this is coming out of a person who doesnt have a rational mind to the person who claims to have a rational mind.

Yea, i repeat that I won't respond till u stop using obscene words coz' I'm not the one who gets happy by degrading others.

maoist are also nepali people, they can be brought under the multiparty democracy. maoist cannot be wiped out (it is impossible now) so what do you do with this situation.

What about going for a preponed parliamentary election and getting new MPs to form the government, sounds like from fiction novel, but will it pave a letout.
By, the way what I don't understand is why are the political parties so afraid of, can't they unite have seat sharing and sweep all the seats by a combined vigilance against government misadventures in election.
If they do not agree, let them resign in masses again in protest, or make use of their political respresentation in muncipality to suit their struggle for full democracy (by the way never fully understood that term). Now, when it comes to power sharing there is deep mistrust and scores to settle among the top brass in political parties. So all these illusionary bonding of joint struggle will be shaken to its root (atleast that is what I sense). I for one, would like democracy to return or be more prevalent so, I belief taking part in the election is the begining of it.

even if they participate and win elections there is no guarantee that king is not going to sack them and say: look as i predicted they can't handle the country; stability is more important than democracy so i'm going to take over now.

how many times does this thing need to be repeated again and again , there is no point so parties should boycott this illegitimate election

Birbhadra, respecting your opinion, I disagree though!

How long will the hornlocking go, someone have to blink first. To you think it is in the political parties to kick the king out, i doubt with double standrads of the leaders (read what is Girijababu saying, toed on same line by Sujhata), Makuni's word and even softened stance by the jungle tiger (Prachanda). The minching words by Indian foreign secretary etc.
Now, since reconcilation is the only way out, why not something to begin with. The leaders are responsible to certain extent for our current plight, so they need to blink their eyelids first, maoist are already seeking soft landing and the feudal system is responsible for the uprising so the king will have to blink. The maoist uprising brought untold misery to Nepal, so they will blink then we will have to blink to ask forgiveness from our conciousness as the misery brought upon us and our future generation have its root origin in our selfishness.

यो नुन माग्न जाँदा छिमेकीले दिएन भनेर रिसाउने, अनि भोलिपल्ट देखि उहि चिसो समझदारीको नातामात्र गाँस्ने गरेर कति दिन चल्छ?
हामी नेपालीहरुको ब्यक्तित्वनै राजा देखि रैतिसम्म यस्तै नै छ कि के हो? बार्ताले भए बार्ताले नभए युध्दले नै भएपनि समस्याको अन्त गर्न किन नसकेको?
सानो कुरालाई पो सानै रुपमा लिने, समस्याको बिकराल स्थिति र अनन्त यो खिटपिट भन्दा त कि आर कि पार गर्नुपर्छ साथी हो।
यहाँ मै माओबादीझैं सुनिएँ होला तर म त अब कि त गिरी चुतियानै भए नी सहि या बाबुचण्ड नै सहि।
द्वैध सरकार खारेज होस्।

kale ji ,

what you said is very true but how will that fact help as long as there is king.
king thinks he knows better than the political leaders he thinks he can control just like mussaraf in pakistan but nepal is no pakistan.
political leaders whether we hate 'em or like 'em they have better understanding of politics than the king