The oldest roots of this conflict probably lie in the ascension of Indo-Aryan elites who more or less simultaneously migrated eastward across Nepal and northward from the Gangetic lowlands as the plains were invaded by Muslim armies during the Middle Ages. Prithvi Narayan Shah began the unification of the country in the late 1700s. This was continued by his heirs, giving birth to modern-day Nepal.

As Nepal emerged from isolation and began to consider political urbanization, there was considerable interest in Marx, Lenin and Mao within some intellectual circles, as well as interest in western-style democracy within other intellectual circles, and also interest in restoring the Shah kings to a more active role among royalists. Brief experiments in democracy, beginning in 1959 and again in 1990, were eventually quashed by King Mahendra and later by his son King Gyanendra.

Nepal became one of the last remaining absolute monarchies on the planet after King Gyanendra dismissed then prime-minister Sher Bahadur Deuba on February 1, 2005. King Gyanendra has repeatedly invoked Article 127 of Nepal's constitution to dissolve parliament and reshuffle the cabinet. However, the constitutionality of these decisions remain controversial among Nepalese. source: http://en.wikipedia.org


Can this lead to a SinghDurbar Parva Where the restoration of parliament takes place????It can be ! the person who can kill his own family wont hesitate to kill those with whom he had to kneel down, and after all he is a businessman, who is also indirectly killing nepalese through Surya Churot.