Lately, there has been a growing tendency to build websites.

This flood of Websites hasnot only made it difficult to get right information, but has also created a distaste in people who believe in the internet as a good sourse of research and information.

Some Websites are dumping sites for all the worst junk of the Web World.
Let's see what we find as examples.

Thats true avant garde. Let me tell you my story, if you will.

Worked as a developer some time back for US firms. All of them wanted their sites to be search engine friendly (SE optimized). Few of them had to be served with bidding their keywords on their behalf in yahoo and google. The job sucked.

Later, me and one of my friend were desperately trying to find some information in google on some topic. We tried real hard. Couldnt find anything except junk. At the end, my friend lost his temper. These were the exact words that came from his mouth out of desperation:

"मुजी, तै जस्तो हरु ले गर्दा हो खोजेको कुरा नपाउने ईन्टरनेट मा".

I was silent, he was true to some extent. We pay to google and yahoo for our sites to be listed on as top as possible. Hence, what you want is not important, how much we pay to google determines what you see in your search. It sucks REAL BIG TIME, my friends !!!

PS Yahoo engine is lesser evil than google. Try it. You will understand.

Meek_Misfit,
I couldn't agree more.
That's the exact feeling behind my creating this thread.
Junk Websites (they are too many to name) suck!!!

Its so scary that they can track your stream of consciousness from your behaviour online, such as the kind of pages you search, the things you buy, the time you spend online on some particular site.

meek misfit -- here is the answer to your concern. protect your privacy online. http://tor.eff.org/

Tried that few months ago. Concerns were raised to the university server by its ISP. There are a lot of legal problems that TOR doesnt protect against. Although, it is not deemed to to be illegal, I am not sure of it.

The accountablity of using TOR is confusing. You can see its legal issue page.

Furthermore, TOR doesnt work when it comes to all IE. I tried that too. It doesn't protect against the methods the bots and crawlers use (the main culprits of security issues) when we use application plugins for Java, Flash, Active X, RealPlayer, Quicktime, Adobe's PDFs, etc. These can be easily manipulated to track your identity.

ic... didn't know about all that. anyways this article has a few more info on surfing anonymously... check it out

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9012778&intsrc=hm_list

You sure are hawatraal, dude !

Google aims to bolster privacy of Web surfer data

By Eric Auchard
Thu Mar 15, 10:13 AM ET



NEW YORK (Reuters) - Google Inc. (Nasdaq:GOOG - news), faced with a mountain of data on its users' Web search habits, is taking steps to bolster consumer privacy protections in coming months, the company said late on Wednesday.

The world's leading provider of Web search said it is taking steps to anonymize, or obscure details, after 18 to 24 months on the surfing habits of tens of millions of Web users that could potentially be used to identify individuals.

The Mountain View, California-based company collects information on Web searches, such as the keyword queries, Internet addresses and "cookies" used by Web sites and advertisers, to track Web surfing habits.

The company stores data in massive computer data centers in various locations around the world.

"Previously, we kept this data for as long as it was useful," Google officials said in statement to be made public on Thursday but provided to reporters on Wednesday.

"Unless we're legally required to retain log data for longer, we will anonymize our server logs after a limited period of time."

Server log data are the endless files of words and numbers that computer administrators use to manage and track Web site activity. Google plans to implement the policy within the next year, it said.

In order to keep Google search as easy and convenient to Web surfers as they repeatedly return to Google's search site, the company said it is necessary to keep limited personal details that tie a user to a computer so that Google's computers can tailor the search to the user's interests.

In promising to make these mounds of personal data anonymous after a period of up to two years, the company is responding to fears expressed by privacy advocates and some government regulators in the United States and Europe at the privacy dangers if such data were ever publicly exposed.

"By anonymizing our server logs after 18-24 months, we think we're striking the right balance between two goals: continuing to improve Google's services for you, while providing more transparency and certainty about our retention practices," the Google statement said.

Google also said it was taking additional steps to design privacy protections into Google products.

These include an "off the record" feature in its Google Talk instant message system making it easier for users to temporarily disable the automatic archiving of conversations, and a "pause" feature in its Google Desktop software, which scours the contents of a user's computer to make it easier to search for documents or other information.

Google cautioned that data retention laws in some national or regional jurisdictions could obligate Google to retain Web server logs at some point in the future.

It also noted that some personalized services Google offers, such as a "search history" -- a computerized memory of your surfing habits -- are based on users voluntarily allowing Google to retain data.

google should have done this a long time ago dude. well i am glad they are doing it now -- they shouldn't be in the spy game...

also, well yeah i really am hawataal... lol