[Show all top banners]

thopa
Replies to this thread:

More by thopa
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Prince harry not to serve in Iraq
[VIEWED 1802 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 05-16-07 5:16 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Prince Harry will not be sent to Iraq because of the "unacceptable risks", the head of the British army has said.
General Sir Richard Dannatt said the prince's deployment would pose a threat to him and those serving alongside him.

The announcement, which represents a U-turn on an earlier decision, was made amid reports militant groups in Iraq planned to kill or kidnap the prince.

Clarence House said Prince Harry was "very disappointed" but would not be leaving the Army as a result.

'Extremely disappointed'

Last month the Ministry of Defence had said the prince would be heading to Iraq as an armed reconnaissance officer in the Blues and Royals regiment.

But on Wednesday, the general said he had reached his decision following a visit to the region at the end of last week.

I know Prince Harry will be extremely disappointed

General Sir Richard Dannatt


Army statement in full

"There have been a number of specific threats, some reported some not reported, which relate directly to Prince Harry as an individual.

"These threats expose not only him but also those around him to a degree of risk that I now deem unacceptable."

General Dannatt said he knew Prince Harry would be extremely disappointed and that his soldiers would miss his presence in Iraq.


Harry would have been deployed with his regiment to Basra

He said the prince had proved himself as an officer of "determination and undoubted talent - and I do not say that lightly".

The army chief did not rule out deploying the 22-year-old prince to the region in the future and paid tribute to all British service personnel deployed around the world.

BBC defence correspondent Paul Wood said there had been a number of "specific threats", but what the Army was most concerned about was the possibility that Iran would use its security services for an attack on the prince.

Reg Keys - whose son Thomas was killed while on active service in Basra in 2003 - said he found the decision distasteful and questioned whether insurgents could have told the prince apart from other service personnel.

"It would appear that Harry's life is more valuable than my son or the other nearly 150 service personnel who've given their lives," Mr Keys added.

'Extreme reluctance'

A Clarence House statement said: "Prince Harry is very disappointed that he will not be able to go to Iraq with his troop on this deployment as he had hoped.

"He fully understands and accepts General Dannatt's difficult decision and remains committed to his army career.

"Prince Harry's thoughts are with his troop and the rest of the battle group in Iraq."

Asked if Harry would quit the Army as a result, a spokesman replied: "Absolutely not."

Former British army commander Colonel Bob Stewart told BBC News 24 the decision would have been taken very reluctantly.

HAVE YOUR SAY
Disappointing for him personally, but the right move by the MoD

Bob, Chester


Send us your comments

He said: "The chief of the general staff has actually made such a decision with extreme reluctance; I know that, he's a personal friend and I know exactly the way he's feeling."

Harry would have been the first British royal to see action since his uncle, Prince Andrew, served as a helicopter pilot during the Falklands conflict in 1982.

A Downing Street spokesman said: "It's an operational decision taken by the military which we of course respect."

But Republic, a group which campaigns for an elected head of state, said the decision showed that "the prince should never have joined the Army".

In a statement it said: "This is a scandalous waste of taxpayer's money, brought on by the Windsor family's obsession with linking themselves to the military."

Former Conservative Defence Secretary Michael Portillo also criticised the MoD for "terrible vacillation" over the issue, and Tory MP Desmond Swayne - a former Territorial Army officer in Iraq - said the decision was a victory for iraqi insurgents.
 
Posted on 05-16-07 11:30 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Ok, so they can send out common ppl's kids out to war and not the precious prince? Hmm...
 
Posted on 05-17-07 2:12 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

yeah but he will keep attending those night parties
 
Posted on 05-17-07 7:15 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

of course it's better that they not send the prince. He will not only be endangering himself, but also those around him, because he will be like a major target for the Iraqi militants. If you think in terms of war, it is a weak strategy to have any troop in more danger than the others and not do anything even when that can be avoided.

With all the hype created, it would be foolish to send him to Iraq only to have everyone after him. Maybe now that they have decided not to send him officially, they might secretly send him under cover!
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
TPS Work Permit/How long your took?
Does the 180 day auto extension apply for TPS?
Travelling to Nepal - TPS AP- PASSPORT
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters