[Show all top banners]

kishnekale
Replies to this thread:

More by kishnekale
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Angelina will do different!
[VIEWED 2346 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 10-12-08 1:52 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

http://www.cnn.com/2008/SHOWBIZ/Movies/10/10/people.angelina.jolie.ap/index.html

 

Ok fine publicity is big part of her game. She knows it and so we do. But when she wants exposure this way, its too much it crosses the extreme. She would shortly be appearing in W’s November issue as a breast-feeding mother. Mammal survived out of breast-feeding Mrs Pitt, you don’t have to teach them now

 

Oh man they have hundreds of ways to be in news when one is Anjelina..i would have least preferred to go this way if I was her. You cant sell motherhood for the sake of publicity. Please be mother, plastic we dont like.

 

You were UNHCR’s  (or even today?) brand ambassador, there must had been hundreds of mothers in your sight feeding their babies on their own. In spite of shortage and tough time, did anyone of them pose oneself for money?

 

W will show little of you, Paris would do full one day, but we wont take any.  

 

 


 
Posted on 10-12-08 8:13 AM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I think some of us may find krishnakale's writing little offending or irresponsible. Here is what I believe beyond her intention of publishing the picture of breastfeeding her child.

I think what Angelina did is the best thing she has done ever. Breastfeeding is good for both mother and baby, and it's not new thing, breastfeeding has been happening for hundreds of thousands of years. But in recent decades, many woman do not prefer doing it because they think, by breastfeeding, they lose their beauty or sexyness contributed by thier boobs. Angelina is beautiful and needs to preserve her sexyness in every way possible as her film industry requires a sexyness. Still she breastfeeds. This is the biggest message or lesson for all young women she can convey and thus she can inspire hundreds of thousands of women to breastfeed their children.

If you have seen the picture to be published in W magagine (you can find the front page picuture on the net), she has shown nothing, just the upper part of a side breast and a small hand of one of her twin babies on that part, where lower part including nipple and baby's head are fully covered by some blanket and the photo was taken by her own boyfriend, not by some professonal photographer. Hundreds of celebrities, including ones from Nepali and Bolliwood film industries or and hundreds of girls in your college/universities show off more of their breasts than what Angelina had flashed off in that picture.

This pictures tells only one thing - she breastfeeded her baby just like almost all of our (yours, mine, and almost everyone's) mothers freastfeeded us in those times and still many of our sisters or sister-in-laws have been doing it. Only difference is that her picture is on the front page of a magagine (because many people are interested to see every of her pictures whether bad or good) while our mothers' pictures were never taken even when they breastfeeded in public hidng the faces of babies and sensual part of their breasts.

She has been working as a goodwill embassador to the UN and she has donated millions of money for charity, she had herself picked up abandoned kids from orphange centers and raising them. She is overall a nice person and in my personal view, she was not doing it just for popularity. She does not need popularity by this way any more I guess (in the past, of course she did this various ways, including showing her full body.)


 
Posted on 10-12-08 12:51 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Ctal, would you like to come back and tell me what was offensive in my content. I don’t think it carries any sarcasm against any group. I simply did not like the way the news was inscribed by cnn. I simply took this action of A. Jolie as another act for publicity. I thought she was not doing the right thing. I can be very wrong perceiving it this way...whats the big deal. Even if you see something slightly or terribly offensive to any individual or a group in my content, I am afraid that was not my INTENT.

 

However, rethinking of the issue in broad term, I must admit I was very narrow in my observation then. I did not think of flipside...surely it would/should help to promote breastfeeding across the masses. Yes, this is true, but don’t you think you were a bit harsh labeling me that way....you could have disagreed and said ‘this is what I see in this action of Angelina’.....tara irresponsible bhannu ta bhayena ni. Nevertheless thank you for your valuable contribution.

 

 

 


 
Posted on 10-12-08 2:47 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

krishnakale, you quickly left some remarks about Angelina without fully understanding the issue/news, so i happened to comment on a stronger language. i am sorry if my first posting really hurt you, my intention was not that. i said offensive or irresponsible because i thought and i expected that you should have seen it from another angle, positive angle when CNN news mentioned nowhere that she flashed off her breast; it just said that she was in a position of breasfeeding her own baby. 

now you know the news in details i guess and realized that her act might not be just for publicity. so i take back the words like 'irresponsible' or 'offensive' that i used to dub your original posting. we should love to see such people/celebrities coming forward and  promoting some good cause instead of just taking such issue as another act of publicity.


 
Posted on 10-12-08 3:49 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Thanks for coming back ctal. To tell you again, the first comment of mine was not reaction of a person just tired of these never-ending gossips on celebrities. I thought the issue of breastfeeding was/is very sensitive and therefore should not be promoted as something eye-catching. But examining AJ’s action in total, yes that was/is justifiable and the implication would be useful in the end.

 

take is easy ctal you fine. hurt bhayeko chahina heart nai chahina hurt hune kurai chahin..jk


 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 30 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
nrn citizenship
अमेरिकामा बस्ने प्राय जस्तो नेपालीहरु सबै मध्यम बर्गीय अथवा माथि (higher than middle class)
Travelling to Nepal - TPS AP- PASSPORT
emergency donation needed
ढ्याउ गर्दा दसैँको खसी गनाउच
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
Morning dharahara
Guess how many vaccines a one year old baby is given
जाडो, बा र म……
Susta Susta Degree Maile REMIXED version
Elderly parents travelling to US (any suggestions besides Special Assistance)?
कल्लाई मुर्ख भन्या ?
1974 AD Pinjadako Suga Remixed
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters