[Show all top banners]

rid
Replies to this thread:

More by rid
What people are reading
Subscribers
Subscribers
[Total Subscribers 1]

stopthewar
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Dr. Judy Wood - Ever seen a building VAPORIZE into dust? Evidence of Directed Energy weapons on 9-11
[VIEWED 5987 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 09-11-12 12:08 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

"Once the truth about the magician's trick is revealed, the show is over."



https://cinqueterra.wordpress.com/

The fact is the planes and fires had nothing to do with the disintegration of the buildings which was the equivalent of "throwing pencil through a wall", according to the architect of the WTC complex.

The fact that the buildings hit the ground in 10 seconds led researchers to conclude that explosives or nuclear weapons must have been employed, but further research shows that neither nuclear bombs nor nanothermite could possibly do the job because there were no chunks of the building, no rubble, only dust and a pile of debris not more than 2 stories tall.

110 stories should have produced a pile around 30 stories and we should have seen desks and toilets and big slabs of concrete, but there was mostly just dust. That dust contains within it microscopic iron sheres, smoking gun evidence of aerosoled molten steel, caused by high heat and explosives. But what explosive could possibly have turned the buildings to dust in 10 seconds? Furthermore, the Towers should have produced a seismic signal of 6.0, not the 2.3 that was recorded. Dust doesn't make a thud.

Whoever demolished the WTC Towers apparently used a weapon that utilizes the nuclear bonds within the molecules of the buildings themselves.

The Towers appear to be ripped apart and turned to dust. Forensic scientist and researcher Dr. Judy Wood points out that the Towers look like giant trees that turn to sawdust from the top down, not the bottom up, as in ordinary controlled demolitions.

Common building demolitions knock out the lowest floors and use the top of the building a big hammer to fall into its footprint. The Towers disintegrated from the top down. Think about that. What does that mean? It means that most of the buildings never hit the ground, they floated away as .01 micron dust. What kind of energy source has the ability to turn a million tons of matter into fine dust in 10 seconds?




About the author--
Dr. Judy Wood received her

B.S. (Civil Engineering, 1981) (Structural Engineering),
M.S. (Engineering Mechanics (Applied Physics), 1983), and
Ph.D. (Materials Engineering Science, 1992) from the Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia.


What Transformed the WTC Buildings to DUST on 9/11?

Based on what we know from previous building collapses and controlled demolitions, the rubble pile of each of the WTC Twin Towers should have been at least 12% of the building's original height (13 stories or more), yet the resulting rubble pile was less than 3 stories tall. This is because the majority of the steel of each tower was turned to dust.





HUTCHISON effect: Solid Iron Bar begins to liquify. Metal Mutation.








Last edited: 11-Sep-12 12:40 PM

 
Posted on 09-11-12 12:23 PM     [Snapshot: 22]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

Media Acknowledges Steel Turned to Dust on 9/11 (Short Clip) | ABC News











 
Posted on 09-11-12 8:31 PM     [Snapshot: 269]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 



Figure 30. An illustration of what a "pancake collapse" would look like. The rubble pile should be at least 1/8 of the original building height (12.5%).
Source
Figure 31. An illustration of what the actual destruction looked like. The rubble pile was no more than 2% of the original building height. Both towers went "poof."

Figure 57(b). A view over the dome of WFC2 shows the damage to WTC6 in the center of the photo. To the left is the collapsed WTC7. Its debris stack is at least five stories high. To the right of WTC6 is the remaining north wall of WTC1 which leans toward WTC6. Where did the wall go? Where did the top 100 floors of the north wall go? They did not fall on WTC6 or WTC7 because there are no steel wheatchex there. Some of the core of WTC1 remains, but where is the rest of the core? The amount of steel on the ground barely covers the ground.
(9/??/01) Source (Thanks to spooked for this picture.)

Last edited: 15-Sep-12 09:03 PM

 
Posted on 09-15-12 9:05 PM     [Snapshot: 449]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

All the data are consistent with an energy weapon. For example, consider the round holes in buildings 5 and 6 and in Liberty Street. A directed-energy weapon by definition could cut into buildings, destroy material and leave discrete boundaries in the buildings. We know of no other explanation that has been offered for these peculiar holes. Similarly, some 1,400 cars were toasted in inexplicable patterns, and no alternative explanation to energy displacement has been offered.

Beam Weapons, Energy Weapons, and Directed Energy Weapons (DEW):

We have used the terms "beam-field weapons" and "directed energy weapons" to refer to unconventional weapons (exotic weapons) that are energy weapons. We broadly define DEW as Energy that is Directed and is used as a Weapon. The full range of these weapons is classified information, so we make no limits or distinction of categories within the realm of energy weapons, as doing so would imply specific knowledge of all that is available. In the following paragraph, we have listed some of the possibilities we are aware of.

Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (conDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).

What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.

In August 2006, we began looking at the bathtub which protected the WTC and it led us to look at more data. The data told us what destroyed the twin towers. The data told us that directed-energy weapons must exist. We were not aware that the US military had directed-energy weapons. After we concluded that some sort of energy weapon was used, we looked for evidence that such weapons exist and found it, as documented here. Developers and manufacturers of DEWs are listed here, along with some examples of their product line, which is available in the public domain. As Sherlock Holmes declared,

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."


 
Posted on 09-11-13 11:02 PM     [Snapshot: 1381]     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     1       ?     Liked by
 

I will bring this topic up annually

 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Work Permit/How long your took?
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
Another Song Playing In My Mind
Does the 180 day auto extension apply for TPS?
Travelling to Nepal - TPS AP- PASSPORT
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters