[Show all top banners]

fountaindew
Replies to this thread:

More by fountaindew
What people are reading
Subscribers
:: Subscribe
Back to: Kurakani General Refresh page to view new replies
 Parties Responsible for Nepal Crisis?
[VIEWED 1342 TIMES]
SAVE! for ease of future access.
Posted on 01-21-06 6:38 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

I guess there are lots of people in Sajha who blame parties for the current Nepal crisis and try to justify the king's right. I feel like shoving up a Bhala up their ass and making it a Trishul.

Anyway: What's a party? It's a group of People who generally share similar viewpoints but it's never exactly the same. Now some people in the party become corrupt and abuse their power. What does that signify? Can you say all people in the party are bad? If Tom Delay is a black sheep within republicans, does that mean all republicans are bad? Maybe in Nepal a lot of people who join parties are fcukin opportunists. But that doesn't mean that after 10 years we can't replace these scums.

However if you look at the king, he's responsible for all his actions. If the king and his son are POSs. Then they are just POSs. Doesn't matter how many generations you wait but they will still remain POSs. Time has proven this.

Now King supporters I want to hear your viewpoints on this. And I don't care what kind of arguments you give but I would still like to shove a bhala up your ass and make it a trishul. I would like to pull a rubberband real tight and aim it right at your nipple. I would like to play tabala in your talu.

NO PEACE. THIS IS WAR!!!
 
Posted on 01-21-06 6:45 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

blame political leaders NOT King. King is always dictator and wants to grab whole property of Nepal.

But, political parties are not meant for that. They always misused opportunities and ran after their own selfishness. If they wanted, they could have shuffled the political structures completely. They could have shuffled army structures. They could have amended laws in favor of people NOT in favor of palace.

Example: Giriga was prime minister when royal massacre happened. He could have seized whole palace and investigate everyone in royal family. Giriga was the supreme power that time. But he never dared to investigate.

There are so many things political parties ignored for the sake of their opportunities.
 
Posted on 01-21-06 6:48 PM     Reply [Subscribe]
Login in to Rate this Post:     0       ?    
 

hahahahahah joke of the century, royal nepal army did not even take orders from any elected leaders. it is a slave organization of theking.

raja le je bhancha tyehi garcha. i can't help but laugh at your childish argument sacchai bhai nai raichau dai haru sanga kehi sika

don't try to be a know it all hero
 


Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.

YOU CAN ALSO



IN ORDER TO POST!




Within last 7 days
Recommended Popular Threads Controvertial Threads
TPS Re-registration case still pending ..
nrn citizenship
ढ्याउ गर्दा दसैँको खसी गनाउच
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र!
emergency donation needed
जाडो, बा र म……
NOTE: The opinions here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com. It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it. - Thanks.

Sajha.com Privacy Policy

Like us in Facebook!

↑ Back to Top
free counters