1. Prachanda announced  "he will lead the New government by himself as a prime minister although he was presented as first president of Nepal. He will be both Prime minister and state head with as much power as Girija has now.

2. One group of maoists want Dr. Baburam to be the prime minister and Girija or Ramraja as a ceremonial President.It is said that Dr saheb can have better support from India.

3. Other group(kiran group-the so called hardliners) are trying to make Ram Bahadur Thapa eka Badal as a Prime minister.

Looks like they don't have one voice at this critical time.

Nepalese people are not expecting same kind of thing for CHAIR.

i actually didnot want to repeat this but your post made me to put it here as well. syaku says.........

Did you know there is something called "KURCHI" in nepali
This applies to each and every politicians who get attached to that
nothing less nothing more

संविधानसभा चुनावको प्रत्यक्षतर्फ बहुमत ल्याएको माओवादीको सरकार प्रचण्डको नेतृत्वमै बन्ने सम्भावना बढेको छ । माओवादीले त्यसबारे अझै निर्णय नगरे पनि प्रचण्ड नै प्रधानमन्त्री बन्नुपर्ने पक्षमा माओवादी नेता/कार्यकर्ता खुल्न थालेका छन् । नयाँ संविधान नबन्दासम्म राष्ट्रपति बन्ने सम्भावना नरहेको तथा प्रधानमन्त्रीले नै राष्ट्रप्रमूखको भूमिका निर्वाह गर्नुपर्ने भएकाले प्रचण्ड पनि प्रधानमन्त्री बन्न इच्छुक रहेको माओवादी श्रोतले बताएको छ । यसअघि भने माओवादीले सरकार बनाए माओवादीका वरिष्ठ नेता डा. बाबुराम भट्टराई प्रधानमन्त्री हुने तथा प्रचण्ड राष्ट्रपतिका लागि पर्खने प्रचारित थियो ।

अन्तरिम संविधानमा राष्ट्रप्रमूख र प्रधानमन्त्रीको अधिकारबारे नखुलाइएको तथा नयाँ संविधान नबनुन्जेल शक्तिसाली राष्ट्रपतिको ब्यवस्था हुने सम्भावना कम रहेको बिश्लेषण गर्दै प्रचण्ड आफै प्रधानमन्त्री बन्ने निश्कर्षमा पुगेको श्रोत बताउछ । राष्ट्रप्रमूख र प्रधानमन्त्रीका दुइ शक्ति केन्द्र बन्ने र तीबीच बिबाद हुने सम्भावना रहेका कारण पनि प्रचण्ड आफैं प्रधानमन्त्री बन्न कस्सिएको श्रोतको दावी छ । श्रोतका अनुसार, प्रचण्डले आफू प्रधानमन्त्री बन्ने खुलासा आइतबारसम्म संचारमाध्यममार्फत गर्ने सम्भावना छ ।   

Now read a article about power strruggle between Baburam and Prachanda.
The original artical was appeared in todays Kantipur daily.
The link of the blog
http://blog.com.np/united-we-blog/2008/05/19/feud-and-power-struggle-within-the-maoist-party/
Full text is below.

........................................................................................................................................................

Who should become the Prime Minister of a Maoist led government? The answer which depends on whom you ask in the Maoist party, it appears, has kicked off another round of power struggle within the former rebel organization.

Oh… the power! It changes people, makes people and breaks people. Most people that is, and Maoists are included. It appears that there is a serious power struggle going on within the Maoist party. Baburam Bhattarai versus supporters of Prachanda, the chairman. Today’s op-ed article in Kantipur daily by Bishwodeep Pandey, personal secretary of Baburam Bhattarai, brings the feud to the public. The article, in Nepali, titled “Baburam a New Pushpalal?” refers to the latest verbal attacks against Baburam by some “opportunist elements inside and outside the party.”Click here to read the article in Nepali. Click here to read as it appeared in the newspaper’s page.]

“The public support for leader Bhattarai against whom the party once took action for vocally raising the slogan of ‘democratic republic’ has been increasing widely both in and outside the party,” writes Pandey. “History has proved right today Bhattarai’s stand of ‘democratic republic’. The slogan he raised has become the common slogan of all Nepali people, not just the Maoist. He played important role by standing on the forefront to implement democratic republic. Unfortunately today the opportunist and regressive elements inside and outside the party are trying to prove him an opponent of republic [through their] ill intended and unsuccessful politics in Goebbels’ style from inside the curtain. How seriously has Bhattarai taken this issue has become the issue of public interest. His well-wishers are complaining why he is quiet instead of countering it.”

The article talks about “rumors” that are being spread claiming that Bhattarai wants cultural monarchy, an idea that Bhattarai floated sometime back when he as asked by reporters about the fate of monarchy after the Maoist victory.

“Likewise some, knowingly or unknowingly, are trying to launch ill-publicity saying that Bahuram is in the race for the second [position] in the party,” says the article.

This appears to be the hint for the challenge posed by Ram Bahadur Thapa ‘Badal’ who occasionally tries to portray himself as the second man after Chairman Prachanda in the party undermining Baburam.

The real friction, it is believed, started a couple of weeks back when the party central committee met to decide about the party’s participation as the leader of the government to be formed. Since Baburam lead the parallel government of the Maoist during insurgency (Revolutionary People’s Council), it was expected that Baburam would be chosen by the party to lead the government as the Prime Minister. “It is our declared stand that the first President of a republic Nepal should be Chairman Prachanda,” he had said at that time. “We haven’t decided who will be chosen for the Prime Minster.”

In the central meeting, it is learned, a proposal was made on behalf of Badal saying that be should be the Prime Minister if not Prachanda. Then to quell the possible feud, Prachanda decided to be the Prime Minister himself.

Mohan Bikram, a communist leader, had branded Pushpalal, the founder of the Communist Party of Nepal, “pro-Indian” and “pro-Congress” while writing a book titled “Traitor Pushpalal”, says the article. “History has proved that that allegation was wrong. Those who can’t compete politically try to brand [others] pro-this and pro-that and a broker.”

“The ‘new Mohan Bikrams’ are widely preparing to make leader Bhattarai a ‘new traitor Pushpalal’. A person should be judged by what he does or doesn’t rather than by what he says or doesn’t say.”

Talking to BBC’s Nepali Service this evening, senior Maoist leader Mohan Baidya has angrily reacted to the article saying that the issue will be raised in the Headquarters.

Since the article is written by a personal assistant to Bhattarai many might think that it is a planned defensive strategy by Bhattarai. [Bishwodeep Panday wrote the article at the office of Kantipur, said a reporter who saw him in Kantipur complex yesterday.]

Jun Jogi Aayae Pani............well we all know the rest.