_____
More by _____
What people are reading
Subscribers
Please log in to subscribe to _____'s postings.
:: Subscribe
|
Now this is what I am talking about
[VIEWED 1179
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
_____
Please log in to subscribe to _____'s postings.
Posted on 09-24-10 6:03
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
72 officers sold their weapons for profit: Army
NEW DELHI: In a shocking disclosure, the Army on Friday admitted that 72 of its officers, including a serving Colonel and three Lt Colonels, posted in sensitive border districts of Rajasthan and in the Indian Army Training Team (IMTRAT) at Bhutan were part of an illegal arms selling racket.
The admission came in a status report submitted to the SC through additional solicitor general Vivek Tankha after a PIL petitioner advocate Arvind Kumar Sharma cried himself hoarse for three years and after the Supreme Court pressed for a probe into the hair-raising racket.
Weapons procured and sold off in violation of the Army Act and Customs Act to arms dealers and private persons included both prohibited and non-prohibited bore and "a total of 72 officers and one JCO were blameworthy" in these cases, the Army said quoting a report submitted by the Court of Inquiry two years ago.
Significantly, in the affidavit submitted before a Bench comprising Justices B Sudershan Reddy and S S Nijjar, the Army authorities put the gross violation to the ignorance of its personnel. It said that its officers posted at IMTRAT, Bhutan, wrongly felt that it was alright for them to import firearms and ammunition and sell them at a profit. "This needs to be corrected immediately," it said.
It gave the names of the Colonel and 3 Lt Cols along with the number of weapons traded by them -- Col Neeraj Rana (5 weapons of Army officers), Lt Col V S Rathore (17 weapons of Army officers including his weapon), Lt Col S S Rathore (5 weapons of Army officers including his own) and Lt Col B S Shekhawat (11 weapons of Army officers).
While clarifying that most of the weapons illegally traded off were not service ones but non-service patterns (NSPs), the Army said: "Forty-five officers and one JCO had sold their NSP weapons without taking sanction of competent authority in violation of SAO 1/S/96 and the Arms Act, 1959. Of these, 10 officers have since retired."
"Twenty-five officers who were posted at IMTRAT, Bhutan, were found to have imported ammunition in excess of their authorization," the status report said and detailed the disciplinary action taken against them.
Shockingly, of the 35 serving officers, one JCO and 10 retired officers who were asked by the authorities to deposit back their NSPs with the Central Ordnance Depot, Jabalpur, within three months, only four officers have been able to retrieve their weapons and deposit the same with COD Jabalpur and Chandigarh.
While disciplinary action was initiated against four who deposited back their weapons after retrieving them from arms dealers, the rest of the weapons appear to have been lost in circulation.
"Regarding 31 officers and a JCO who had sold their NSPs without sanction and failed to deposit them back with COD, these personnel are serving in various parts of the country. Their attachment orders have been issued by competent authority on August 31, 2010 with the instructions to report to the concerned formation headquarters and units forthwith. On arrival of these officers, disciplinary action will commence against them under the Army Act and Army Rules," the affidavit by the Army promised to the SC.
During the last hearing on the PIL filed by Sharma highlighting the dangerous consequences of such illegal transactions involving arms and ammunition, the Bench had said: "These are such serious allegations. We never expected such things to happen."
What had pained the court was the Centre's inaction to curb such incidents despite the Rajasthan government lodging 14 FIRs. The Bench on Friday also asked the state government to furnish an inquiry report prepared by inspector-general Umesh Mishra of the state Anti-Corruption Branch giving details of the transactions. The report dated July 15, 2007 would be submitted in a sealed cover.
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/72-officers-sold-their-weapons-for-profit-Army/articleshow/6622221.cms
Last edited: 24-Sep-10 06:04 PM
Last edited: 24-Sep-10 07:17 PM
|
|
|
Please Log in! to be able to reply! If you don't have a login, please register here.
YOU CAN ALSO
IN ORDER TO POST!
Within last 200 days
Recommended Popular Threads |
Controvertial Threads |
TPS Re-registration |
What are your first memories of when Nepal Television Began? |
निगुरो थाहा छ ?? |
ChatSansar.com Naya Nepal Chat |
TPS Re-registration case still pending .. |
Basnet or Basnyat ?? |
Sajha has turned into MAGATs nest |
NRN card pros and cons? |
Do nepalese really need TPS? |
कता जादै छ नेपाली समाज ?? |
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you |
मन भित्र को पत्रै पत्र! |
Will MAGA really start shooting people? |
Democrats are so sure Trump will win |
Top 10 Anti-vaxxers Who Got Owned by COVID |
I regret not marrying a girl at least for green card. do you think TPS will remain for a long time? |
TPS Work Permit/How long your took? |
काेराेना सङ्क्रमणबाट बच्न Immunity बढाउन के के खाने ?How to increase immunity against COVID - 19? |
Breathe in. Breathe out. |
3 most corrupt politicians in the world |
|
Nas and The Bokas: Coming to a Night Club near you |
Mr. Dipak Gyawali-ji Talk is Cheap. US sends $ 200 million to Nepal every year. |
Harvard Nepali Students Association Blame Israel for hamas terrorist attacks |
TPS Update : Jajarkot earthquake |
|
NOTE: The opinions
here represent the opinions of the individual posters, and not of Sajha.com.
It is not possible for sajha.com to monitor all the postings, since sajha.com merely seeks to provide a cyber location for discussing ideas and concerns related to Nepal and the Nepalis. Please send an email to admin@sajha.com using a valid email address
if you want any posting to be considered for deletion. Your request will be
handled on a one to one basis. Sajha.com is a service please don't abuse it.
- Thanks.
|