How do you define the relation between Parliamentarian Parties
and their relation to King and Maoists.

combinations are :

1. Parliamentarian vs (King + Maoist)
2. King vs (Parliamentarian + Maoists)
3. (Parliamentarian + King) vs Maoists: Worst Combination. Not possible, any more.
4. Triangular: Parliamentarian vs King vs Maoists.
5. King vs Maoist where Parliamentarian are friction less (i.e. negligible).

Which combination would best fit to solve the current crisis?
Which one will be the final one whether we want or not?

Can parliamentarian save their dignity for a couple of years ahead,
before Maoists get to Power? Will they be able to avoid another disaster,
that might be caused by Maoist winning King's forces, and if King get
ousted. this will be worst scenario to nepalis. It up to Parliamentarian
how they act ahead. But, these corrupt politicians will not be able to
return trust and dignity. We need fresh faces and that will take time.

Can NRNA lead and become next generation leaders, ousting Banarashi
Leaders? Or NRNA will act as Useful idiots if King offers them Gorkha
Dakchhin Bahu Padak?

Lets see.
GP

Combination (2) is the most feasible option for future Nepal. It is the monarchy that made us far behind in all aspects. It is the monarchy that forced Moist to raise arms. It is the monarchy that treated us as 'Raiti'. It is the monarchy that put Nepalese into dark by cutting our nation from rest of the world. Sooner or later, it should be abolished. Further, maoist shouldnot be autocratic and political parties should no more support the monarchy in any case. Compromise between political parties and maoists for multi-party democracy, freedom, human rights and nationalism should be the best for golden Nepal, which will not only get international support but also assistance to Nepal.

------
OK